Summary
The No Columbia Wind project assists local landowners in educating public officials about a proposed windfarm’s impacts on property values, public health and safety. The education is focused on opportunities through local government and the courts to minimize the negative impacts of the project. If necessary, the project will also involve litigation to minimize the negative impacts–including stopping the project altogether.
Overview
Reason to Invest:
People might invest in stopping a wind farm project for a variety of reasons, often driven by a combination of concerns that can be broadly categorized as:
1. Economic Concerns:
-
Property Value Depreciation: The presence of wind farms can negatively impact property values in surrounding areas due to visual impact, noise, and perceived health concerns.
-
Impact on Local Industries: While wind farms can bring some construction jobs and tax revenue, concerns exist about their long-term employment opportunities and potential negative impacts on other local sectors, such as tourism or agriculture (though farmers can also benefit from lease payments).
-
High Costs and Subsidies: Wind energy projects, especially offshore, can have significant upfront installation and maintenance costs, often requiring substantial taxpayer and ratepayer subsidies, which some argue raise electricity rates.
-
Intermittency and Grid Integration: Wind is an intermittent energy source, meaning it doesn't blow consistently, which creates challenges for grid stability and can necessitate backup generation or storage, adding to overall costs.
-
Opportunity Costs for Landowners: While lease payments can benefit landowners, there can be opportunity costs related to lost revenue from arable land during construction or restrictions on land use due to option agreements.
-
Decommissioning Costs: Concerns exist about who is ultimately responsible for the costs of decommissioning turbines at the end of their lifespan and restoring the land to its original state.
2. Environmental and Wildlife Concerns:
-
Bird and Bat Fatalities: Wind turbines pose a risk of collision for birds and bats, especially migratory species. While studies suggest the overall impact might be less than other human-related causes, it remains a significant concern for conservationists and local residents.
-
Habitat Destruction/Fragmentation: The construction of wind farms, including access roads and transmission lines, can lead to the loss or fragmentation of natural habitats, impacting local ecosystems.
-
Marine Life Disturbance: Offshore wind farms can impact marine mammals and fish through construction noise (e.g., pile driving), changes in electromagnetic fields from cabling, and alteration of marine habitats.
-
Visual Pollution: Many people object to the aesthetic impact of large wind turbines on scenic landscapes, particularly in rural or coastal areas, which can affect tourism and quality of life.
-
Noise Pollution: While modern turbines are quieter, residents living near wind farms can report persistent noise disturbances, including audible noise and low-frequency infrasound, which some attribute to health issues ("Wind Turbine Syndrome").
3. Quality of Life and Community Concerns:
-
Noise and Vibration: Beyond environmental noise, the constant noise and vibration from turbines can impact the well-being of nearby residents, leading to sleep disturbances, headaches, or other symptoms.
-
Shadow Flicker: The rotating blades can cast moving shadows, creating a flickering effect that can be disruptive and, in rare cases, trigger health issues in susceptible individuals.
-
Radar and Communication Interference: Wind turbines can interfere with radar systems, television signals, and mobile phone networks.
-
Mistrust and Misinformation: Some communities may feel that wind developers under-deliver on economic promises or spread misinformation about the project's impacts. External groups, sometimes funded by fossil fuel interests, can also actively spread misinformation to stir up local opposition.
-
Loss of Community Identity: The fundamental alteration of landscapes can lead to a loss of cultural and historical significance in certain regions, affecting community identity.
Team
.jpg)
Gregory M. Erickson
Contact Me: (612) 979-9791
Education University of Minnesota Law School, Minneapolis, Minnesota J.D. - 1997 Honors: cum laude Miami University, Oxford, Ohio B.A. - 1993 Honors: Cum Laude Major: Political History Science Bar Admissions Minnesota Wisconsin United States Supreme Court U.S. Court of Appeals 7th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals 8th Circuit U.S. District Court Eastern District of Wisconsin U.S. District Court Western District of Wisconsin U.S. District Court Northern District of Illinois Representative Cases Advanced Communication Design v. Follett, 615 N.W. 2d 285, 2000 Pergament v. Loring Properties, Ltd., 599 N.W.2d 146, 1999 Digital Resources LLC v. James Loestetter, et. al., 246 B.R. 357, 2000 Past Positions Rider Bennett, LLP, Partner Professional Associations Minnesota Bar Association, Member Hennepin County Bar Association, Member American Bar Association, Member Certified Legal Specialties M.S.B.A. Board Certified Real Estate Specialist
.jpg)
Elizabeth Nielsen
Contact Me: (612) 979-9791
Education University of Illinois College of Law, Illinois J.D. - 2022 Honors: magna cum laude Honors: Rickert Award for Excellence in Advocacy Honors: Paul M. Lisnek Award for Excellence and Ethics in Trial Advocacy Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Illinois B.A. - 2014 Honors: summa cum laude Honors: Chancellor’s Scholar Major: Political Science Major: Theater Minor: French Bar Admissions Minnesota Michigan Pennsylvania U.S. Court of Appeals 3rd Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals 6th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals 8th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals 9th Circuit U.S. District Court District of Minnesota U.S. District Court Eastern District of Michigan

Erick G. Kaardal
Contact Me: (612)-341-1074
Education University of Chicago Law School, Chicago, Illinois J.D. - 1992 Harvard College Honors: magna cum laude Honors: U.S. Army Reserve Officer Training Corps scholarship Major: Economics Bar Admissions Minnesota Wisconsin U.S. Supreme Court U.S. Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals 3rd Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals 6th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals 7th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals 8th Circuit U.S. District Court District of Minnesota U.S. District Court Eastern District of Wisconsin U.S. District Court Western District of Wisconsin U.S. District Court Central District of Illinois U.S. District Court Northern District of Iowa U.S. District Court District of Idaho U.S. District Court Northern District of Georgia U.S. District Court Eastern District of Michigan U.S. District Court Western District of Michigan U.S. District Court Western District of Pennsylvania U.S. Court of Federal Claims U.S. Tax Court Representative Cases Republican Party of Minnesota v. White (U.S. Supreme Court victory 5-4), 2002 Minnesota Voters Alliance v. Mansky (U.S. Supreme Court victory 7-2), 2018 Honors Outstanding Contribution to the Cause of Liberty, Institute for Justice Minnesota Lawyer, Lawyer of the Year, 2018 Life Legal Defense Foundation "Defender of Life" Award Winner – 2021 Pro-Bono Activities Republican Party of Minnesota, Past Secretary/Treasurer John Adams Society, Past Chairman Minnesota Chapter of the Federalist Society, Advisory Board Member Past Positions Mohrman, Kaardal & Erickson, PA - since January 1, 2000 Trimble & Associates, Ltd., Associate Attorney, 1994-1999 Faegre & Benson, Associate Attorney, 1992-1994 U.S. Army Reserves, Minnesota and Illinois National Guard, Field Artillery Officer, Captain (retired)
About
Project Pitch :
"We're raising funds to legally challenge the Columbia wind turbine proposal project, which poses a direct threat to property values and environmental integrity in our region. Our plan is sound, our community is united, and with your support, we can prevent this damaging development."
"We're seeking investment to halt the proposed Columbia wind turbine proposal project. This 500-foot-tall industrial development threatens to decimate local property values, cripple our tourism industry, and create significant legal liabilities for the community. We have a robust legal strategy and strong local opposition, and with your support, we can protect our assets and prevent an irreversible economic downturn."
"Imagine a pristine landscape, forever scarred by towering industrial turbines. That's the imminent threat of the Columbia wind turbine proposal project. We're building a powerful coalition to legally challenge this destructive development, preserving our cherished natural resources, protecting endangered species, and safeguarding the quality of life for our community. Your investment is a chance to defend what's irreplaceable."
"There's a critical window right now to stop the Columbia wind turbine proposal – a poorly sited project facing mounting opposition. We've identified key legal vulnerabilities and have a highly experienced team ready to act. Investing with us isn't just about stopping this one project; it's about setting a crucial precedent against ill-conceived industrial developments that threaten property, environment, and community health. We can win this."
Organization Information:
https://www.nocolumbiawind.com/
Milestones
Phase 1- Getting Organized Locally $25,000 - COMPLETED
Organizing locally to oppose a wind farm can be a complex but achievable endeavor. It requires strategic planning, community engagement, and often, professional advice. Here's a breakdown of how to approach it:
Early Action and Information Gathering:
-
Don't Panic, But Act Quickly: Wind farm projects often move fast in their initial stages. The earlier you start organizing, the more impact you can have.
-
Understand the Project:
-
Project Details: Get all available information on the proposed wind farm: exact location, number and height of turbines, megawatts, transmission lines, access roads, and construction timeline.
-
Permitting Process: Research the local, county, state, and potentially federal permitting processes. Understand the relevant zoning laws, ordinances, and environmental regulations.
-
-
Developer Information: Identify the developer, their track record, and past projects.
-
Identify Key Stakeholders: Who will be directly affected? Property owners, farmers, local businesses, environmental groups, indigenous communities, etc.
Form a Core Action Group:
-
Initial Meetings: Hold small, informal meetings with concerned neighbors.
-
Establish a Group Name: Choose a name that clearly communicates your purpose (e.g., "Citizens for a Sustainable [Town Name]," "Protect [Area Name] from Industrial Wind").
-
Define Your Mission and Goals: What are your primary concerns? What do you hope to achieve (e.g., stop the project, modify it, move it)?
-
Assign Roles: Designate a chair, secretary, treasurer, research coordinator, media liaison, legal liaison, and fundraising lead. This distributes the workload and ensures accountability.
-
Connect with Others: Reach out to other communities that have successfully opposed wind farms. Learn from their experiences, strategies, and challenges. Organizations like National Wind Watch can be good resources.
PHASE - 2 Education; Local Opposition Phase $75,000 - COMPLETED
Build Community Awareness and Support:
-
Public Meetings: Organize well-advertised public meetings to inform the wider community. Invite local officials, experts (if possible), and the local press. Use these meetings to gauge opposition, gather facts, and recruit more volunteers.
-
Information Dissemination:
-
Flyers and Brochures: Create clear, concise materials outlining your concerns and calls to action. Distribute them widely.
-
Website/Social Media: Establish a strong online presence (Facebook group, website, etc.) to share information, updates, and resources. This is crucial for reaching a broad audience and countering developer narratives.
-
Email Lists: Build an email list to keep supporters informed.
-
-
Visual Protests:
-
Lawn Signs and Banners: Highly visible and effective for demonstrating widespread opposition.
-
Group T-shirts/Hats: Can create a sense of unity and visibility at public meetings.
-
-
Petitions: Collect signatures to demonstrate the level of local opposition to local officials and the developer.
-
Letters to the Editor: Encourage community members to write letters to local newspapers expressing their concerns.
-
Door-to-Door Canvassing: Talk to neighbors directly to understand their concerns and educate them about the project.
Research and Documentation:
-
Impact Studies: Gather information on the potential negative impacts of wind farms:
-
Noise: Research acoustic studies and potential health effects of audible and infrasound noise.
-
Visual Impact/Shadow Flicker: Document the visual impact on the landscape and the potential for shadow flicker on homes.
-
Wildlife: Research potential impacts on birds (especially migratory paths), bats, and other local wildlife.
-
Property Values: Find data on property value depreciation near wind farms.
-
Health Concerns: While often disputed by developers, collect testimonials and research on "Wind Turbine Syndrome" or other reported health issues.
-
Interference: Investigate potential interference with radar, TV, or cell signals.
-
-
Developer's Claims: Scrutinize the developer's claims about economic benefits, environmental advantages, and noise levels. Look for independent assessments.
-
Local Ordinances: Understand existing local ordinances related to noise, setbacks, height, and environmental protection. Identify any gaps or weaknesses that need to be addressed.
-
Expert Consultation: If possible, consult with experts in acoustics, real estate, environmental law, or land use planning.
Engage with Decision-Makers:
-
Local Government Officials:
-
Identify Key Players: Determine which local boards, commissions, or officials have decision-making power (e.g., planning commission, zoning board, county commissioners).
-
Meet Early and Often: Request meetings with individual officials to explain your concerns and provide them with information. Build relationships based on respectful dialogue.
-
Attend Meetings: Show up in numbers at all public meetings related to the project. Speak during public comment periods.
-
Provide Written Comments: Submit detailed written objections during public comment periods. These become part of the official record.
-
-
State and Federal Representatives: Depending on the project's scale and funding, engage with state and federal elected officials who may have influence.
-
Community Benefit Agreements (CBAs): While your primary goal might be opposition, if the project seems inevitable, you might explore the possibility of negotiating a strong Community Benefit Agreement to mitigate negative impacts and ensure local benefits. This should be done strategically and with legal counsel.
Legal and Fundraising Strategies:
-
Legal Counsel: Consult with an attorney specializing in land use, environmental law, or administrative law. They can advise on legal challenges, permitting loopholes, and potential lawsuits (e.g., nuisance claims).
-
Fundraising: Opposition campaigns can be expensive. Start a fighting fund to cover costs for legal fees, expert consultations, public outreach materials, and website maintenance.
-
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR): Your attorney can advise on options like mediation or arbitration if appropriate.
PHASE - 3 Model Ordinances ($48,000)
Duration : 3 Months
The development and submission of ordinances regarding No Columbia Wind farms in local townships or jurisdiction.
Procurement of Ordinance Attorney(s) $5,000
Discussion of Legal Regulation of Ordinances $5,000
Attorney Drafting of Ordinances Regulating Windfarms $15,000
Educating Public of Ordinances Regulating Windfarms $5,000
Amicae Curiae Brief - Massachusetts $10,000
Administrative $3,000
PHASE - 4 Litigation, if necessary ($240,000)
Duration : 1 - 3 Years
The evaluation of litigation opportunities begins at the outset of the project. Opportunities may present themselves in an administrative or legal context. A litigation budget to stop a windfarm project would be about $200,000 including:
Pre-complaint and complaint work $50,000
Motion to Dismiss/Discovery Work $50,000
Summary Judgment/Trial work $100,000
Administrative - Expert Requirements $40,000

